- Products & Solutions
- All Industries
- About Us
By Kirt Boston, Program Manager, Donaldson Torit, and Bob Walters, Senior Regional Sales Engineer, Donaldson Torit
Plasma and laser cutting are bedrock processes of flexible metal fabrication. Nevertheless, they produce extremely fine particles that can present a variety of risks detrimental to machinery and employees.
Thermal cutting creates particulate that has to be filtered. Material removed during cutting produces slag, smoke and fine, thermally generated particles. Slag typically drops to the bottom of the table floor, while smoke and fine particles rise above the workpiece unless adequate downward airflow—generated by the dust collection system—overcomes the thermal rise. Particles can range from sub-micron to dozens of microns in size, and controlling them requires a properly selected and installed filtration system.
System designs depend on the cutting environment and process parameters. A large plasma table has different airflow requirements than a small laser table. Plasma cutting produces different particle-size ranges than laser cutting. Even related functions, such as automated material loading systems, affect system designs because of increased cutting time. These factor into design requirements just as much as material type and thickness, cutting kerf widths, and part nesting.
In essence, a well-designed dust collection system should transform the entire cutting work envelope into an effective fume-capture system.
Getting dust collection right is essential for both environmental and operational reasons. In recent years, OSHA has significantly lowered the permissible exposure limits of many dusts, including manganese as well as hexavalent chromium from cutting chromium-rich metals like stainless steel. The EPA continues to focus on not only the reduction of particulates 2.5 microns and smaller, but also other metal compounds including cadmium, chromium, lead, manganese, and nickel, all produced in a variety of metal fabrication and finishing operations.
Air used in controlling thermal cutting fume and contaminants can contain hot sparks. If sparks are not eliminated, they can be conveyed to potential fuel throughout the dust collection system. Controlling ignition sources is therefore critical to avoid the damage and disruption fires create. Also, if filtered air is returned to the production area, secondary filters can confirm the operational performance of primary filters, ensuring the returned air is clean and safe.
Shops also must consider risks from capturing particulate of different materials when they may be incompatible. This could include particulate from dissimilar metals as an example, where the metals and metal oxides may represent the potential for a thermite reaction. Combustion risks affect filter system layouts and design decisions. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) publishes several standards that can be applied to help mitigate the many risks associated with combustible metal dusts.
Effective dust collection starts with hoods that efficiently capture and control particulates. System performance is limited to what the hood can accomplish. Buying the most expensive dust collector and installing high-efficiency filters will not increase overall efficiency beyond 50 percent if the hood captures only half the dust and fume.
When thermal cutting, the cutting table is the capture hood. The hood must pull consistent air volumes continuously to capture contaminants. If it doesn’t, dust and fume escape.
Fiber area not filter area, is a key to effective filtration. Designing a filter should therefore include lots of small fibers, to increase the available fiber surface area by orders of magnitude.
Basic traditional filter media enhanced with a layer of nanofibers will provide the best filtration performance in capturing fine particles from thermal cutting. This layer of nanofibers increases the filter media’s efficiency dramatically when working with thermally generated particles. Nanofibers also prevent fine particles from embedding deep within the filter fibers, forcing particles to accumulate at the media’s surface (see Figure 1). This creates an extremely effective, surface-loading filter.
Surface loading shows its benefits when pulse cleaning the filter. Most pulse cleaned dust collectors incorporate a compressed air manifold and diaphragm valve arrangement. When a pilot solenoid valve is energized, the diaphragm valve allows compressed air to exit the manifold as a “pulse,” which forces particles off the filter surface. Effective pulse cleaning drives the dust off the filter media and into a storage container.
Surface-loading filters stop the particles at the surface of the media where it is easily pulsed off, extending filter life and reducing energy consumption (see Figure 2). If particles are not stopped on the surface, filters depth-load, which allows fumes to enter the depth of the media. It is very difficult if not impossible for pulse cleaning to discharge these depth-loaded particles. This in turn shortens filter life and increases energy consumption.
The amount of dust produced by an application, or its dust load influences the size of the collector needed as a higher dust load increases a dust collector’s workload. Over a given time period, laser cutting may produce less dust than plasma cutting. Although the airflow needed to capture the fume from a laser cutting and plasma process may be identical, dust collector sizes might differ because of the different dust loads.
Lower dust loading from laser cutting might suggest less collector workload, but particle size also plays a role. Smaller dust particles on the filter tend to cake together, with smaller void spaces between particles, which in turn increases the pressure needed to pull air through the layer of dust. If this isn’t accounted for, a dust collector may consume more energy and require more frequent cleaning.
All dust collection systems have temperature limits and any increased heat load may require different construction. Under some circumstances cooler air may need to be bled into the system to keep the total air temperature within the collector’s operating limits.
Heat load and hood design also differ between processes. Oxyfuel cutting, for instance, generates relatively low dust loads but produces significant heat. This additional heat load must be accounted for when selecting the dust collector’s materials of construction—especially the filters. Plasma cutting and laser cutting generally generate a lower heat load but produce heavier dust loads.
Table design can also affect heat load. For instance, structural cutting lines may use a plasma torch to cut beams or plates, with sparks and melted metal evacuating through a narrow slot below the cutting zone. This will generate higher heat loads than traditional open area downdraft cutting tables.
Automation also changes collector sizing considerations. In manual cutting, operators take parts off of a table and then load new sheets. During this downtime a dust collector can “catch-up” on pulse-cleaning under heavy load conditions.
Automated material handling switches out finished sheets in minutes, so cutting and part removal occur at the same time. This feature increases shop productivity, but it makes dust collection more challenging, because the collector is exposed to more cutting time and has less time to “catch its breath.” Such automation often leads to higher dust and fume loads, and a dust collector should be sized to accommodate those loads.
To effectively capture fume and dust from a cutting process, a fan draws air past the workpiece downward through the cutting table to create an airflow pattern (see Figure 3). The fan provides the energy to overcome turbulence and friction losses as air moves from the cutting zone, through the ducts, the collector, the filter media, and through the dust cake.
A properly designed dust collection system should pull the required air volume (cubic foot per minute, or CFM) constantly. Too much air will shorten filter life, and too little air will reduce the system’s capture efficiency. The energy required to overcome the resistance in the system, or the static pressure, changes over time as filters become dirty.
Static pressure values often are expressed in inches of water gauge, which are mere fractions of a pound per square inch—about 27.7 inches of water equals approximately one PSI. A new, clean filter starts with very little airflow resistance, often less than one inch, but over time the dust accumulation on the filters increases resistance to several inches. Filters should be replaced as resistance begins to exceed a certain point. In many cases this may be five or six inches, but in some instances filters aren’t considered plugged until their resistance reaches much higher levels.
To extend the operational life of the filter media, a modern dust collector uses pulse-clean filters. This periodic reconditioning allows these systems to run continuously without continual filter replacement.
Under normal operation, a dust collector achieves a stable, “seasoned” condition where the filters have a relatively uniform resistance a few inches higher than when new, because of a “filter cake” that forms on the media surface. Over time, some degree of depth loading and other actions will gradually plug the media increasing resistance slowly. Eventually, it will prove more cost effective to replace the filters than to attempt continued operation at higher fan energies.
To ensure effective performance throughout the effective life of the filters, fans are generally sized to deliver the desired air volume at the “plugged” pressure drop of the filters filters—that is, the highest or “terminal” pressure drop condition.
To ensure the optimum operational life of the filters a dust collector must have a controlled air volume to avoid pulling excess air through the system. Dust collection systems therefore often incorporate a damper on the fan to adjust for resistance changes in the filters as they become plugged. The partial closure of the damper ensures the fan pulls only the desired air volume when the filters have relatively little resistance. Dampers however are not the only way to control airflow, adjustable-speed motors allow fan speed and therefore performance to be adjusted to not only controls airflow but to allow energy savings.
The greater the air volume required to control the dust and fume from cutting, the larger the dust collection system. As a consequence many large cutting systems will be compartmentalized, or zoned. This approach requires airflow only in the space below the cutting bed, translating to a smaller air volume and thus a smaller dust collection system.
In other situations, the stock being cut may have existing openings that create the need to pull additional air, and dust collectors should be designed with this extra capacity requirement in mind. Increasing the collector capacity in this instance ensures the system maintains the necessary downdraft velocity across all the openings for effective dust evacuation.
Finally, a collector fan should generate sufficient airflow through the cutting table to create the downdraft velocities needed to capture rising fume. Air velocity typically needs to reach 150 to 250 CFM to control fume effectively, but this requirement may increase depending on the table design, size, and cutting process.
Many variables influence dust control system performance during thermal cutting, and a well-designed system including the ducts, fan, and filtration media should take all the variables and elements into account. When well designed the system should maintain consistent downward airflow velocity to effectively evacuate dust across a range of filter and operational cutting conditions.
Designing and integrating an effective dust collection system for thermal cutting is not a one-size-fits-all exercise. Considering all the factors mentioned will help ensure a shop gets the most out of its dust collection system.